Google: Disavowing Random Hyperlinks Flagged By Tools Is A Waste Of Time

Posted by

Google’s John Mueller responded to a concern about using the link disavow tool and offered a pointer about the very best method to use it, particularly mentioning links flagged by tools.

Although this tool was presented ten years ago there is still much confusion as to the proper use of it.

Connect Disavow Tool

The link disavow tool was introduced by Google in October 2012.

The disavow tool followed in the wake of the Penguin Algorithm from May 2012, which ushered in a period of unmatched chaos in the search marketing neighborhood because so many individuals were buying and offering links.

This period of freely purchasing and selling links came to a stop on Might 2012 when the Penguin algorithm update was launched and thousands of sites lost rankings.

Getting paid links got rid of was a huge discomfort for since they had to demand elimination from every website, one by one.

There were so many link elimination requests that some website owners began charging a cost to eliminate the links.

The SEO neighborhood begged Google for a simpler way to disavow links and in reaction to popular need Google released the Link Disavow tool on October 2012 for the express function of disavowing spam links that a site owner was accountable for.

The idea of a link disavow tool was something that had actually been subjugating for many years, a minimum of given that 2007.

Google withstood releasing that tool till after the Penguin update.

Google’s main announcement from October 2012 described:

“If you have actually been notified of a manual spam action based on “unnatural links” pointing to your site, this tool can assist you attend to the issue.

If you have not gotten this notification, this tool typically isn’t something you require to stress over.”

Google likewise used details of what type of links might activate a manual action:

“We send you this message when we see proof of paid links, link exchanges, or other link plans that violate our quality guidelines.”

John Mueller Guidance on Link Disavow Tool

Mueller answered a question about disavowing links to a domain residential or commercial property and as a side note provided advice on the correct use of the tool.

The concern asked was:

“The disavow function in Browse Console is presently not available for domain residential or commercial properties. What are the alternatives then?”

John Mueller addressed:

“Well, if you have domain level confirmation in place, you can validate the prefix level without requiring any additional tokens.

Confirm that host and do what you need to do.”

Then Mueller added an extra comment about the correct way to utilize the link disavow tool.

Mueller continued his answer:

“Also, bear in mind that disavowing random links that look odd or that some tool has actually flagged, is not an excellent use of your time.

It changes absolutely nothing.

Use the disavow tool for situations where you in fact spent for links and can’t get them removed afterwards.”

Hazardous Link Tools and Random Hyperlinks

Lots of 3rd party tools utilize proprietary algorithms to score backlinks according to how spammy or poisonous the tool company feels they are.

Those toxicity scores may accurately rank how bad certain links seem however they do not always associate with how Google ranks and uses links.

Poisonous link tool ratings are simply opinions.

The tools work for creating an automated backlink review, particularly when they highlight negative links that you believed were good.

However, the only links one ought to be disavowing are the links one knows are spent for or belong of a link scheme.

Should You Believe Anecdotal Proof of Harmful Hyperlinks?

Lots of people experience ranking losses and when inspecting their backlinks are surprised to find a big amount of exceptionally low quality webpages linking to their websites.

Naturally it’s presumed that this is the factor for the ranking drops and a never-ending cycle of link disavowing commences.

In those cases it might work to think about that there is some other reason for the modification in rankings.

One case that stands apart is when someone came to me about a negative SEO attack. I took a look at the links and they were actually bad, precisely as explained.

There were numerous adult themed spam links with exact match anchor text on unassociated adult topics pointing to his website.

Those backlinks fit the meaning of an unfavorable SEO attack.

I wondered so I independently called a Googler by email.They emailed me back the next day and validated that unfavorable SEO was not the reason that the website had actually lost rankings.

The genuine cause for the loss of rankings was that the website was affected by the Panda algorithm.

What set off the Panda algorithm was poor quality material that the site owner had actually developed.

I have seen this lot of times since then, where the real issue was that the site owner was not able to objectively review their own material so they blamed links.

It’s useful to keep in mind that what appears like the apparent reason for a loss in rankings is not necessarily the real reason, it’s just the most convenient to blame since it’s apparent.

But as John Mueller said, disavowing links that a tool has flagged and that aren’t paid links is not a good usage of time.


Featured image by Best SMM Panel/Asier Romero

Listen to the Google SEO Office Hours video at the 1:10 minute mark